Get the CodeRabbit dealCodeRabbit reviews pull requests the way a senior engineer would: line by line, with the rest of the codebase in view. Every plan opens with a 14-day free trial and no credit card, and if your repository is public, reviews are free forever — which is the whole offer, plainly stated. There is no discount code, and any site selling you one is selling you nothing.
This page covers what the trial actually includes, what each paid tier adds, which git platforms it runs on, and the alternatives worth weighing — so you can judge it on the review quality rather than the marketing.
Current CodeRabbit offer
The offer is CodeRabbit's own: 14 days free on any plan, with no card taken up front, so the trial ends rather than converts. That matters for a review tool — two weeks is roughly the span you need to see it against a real sprint's worth of pull requests rather than a toy branch.
Underneath the trial sits a genuinely free tier: install CodeRabbit on a public repository and reviews stay free, with no time limit. Maintainers of open-source projects can stop here and never pay. Private repositories are where the paid plans begin, priced per developer.
Expiration: The trial and the open-source tier are standing parts of CodeRabbit's pricing rather than a limited-time promotion. Confirm the current terms on their pricing page before you commit. Source: CodeRabbit's official pricing page, checked 29 September 2026.
How to claim the CodeRabbit deal
- 1Open CodeRabbitUse the button on this page to reach CodeRabbit’s site.
- 2Sign in with your git providerSign up with GitHub or GitLab — the same account that owns the repositories you want reviewed.
- 3Install it on a repositoryPoint it at a repo. A public one is reviewed free with no time limit; a private one starts your 14-day trial.
- 4Open a pull requestReviews run automatically on new PRs. Read the line comments, apply the one-click fixes, and argue with it in the chat where it is wrong.
- 5Pick a plan if you keep itChoose Essentials, Team or Advanced by the checks you actually used during the trial, not the longest feature list.
CodeRabbit pricing
CodeRabbit's list pricing as published on 29 September 2026, per developer per month. The annual column is the effective monthly rate when billed yearly. Every paid plan includes the 14-day trial; public repositories are free on all of them.
| Plan | Monthly | Annual | What you get |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open source | $0 | $0 | Free reviews forever on public repositories |
| Essentials | $30/dev | $24/dev | AI reviews, 1-click fixes, learnings, agentic chat, linter and SAST support, Jira and Linear integrations |
| Team | $60/dev | $48/dev | Everything in Essentials plus triage, custom pre-merge checks, finishing touches such as unit tests and merge-conflict resolution, post-merge actions and higher limits |
| Advanced | $90/dev | $72/dev | Everything in Team plus blast-radius and architectural impact analysis, a security review on every PR and continuous security monitoring |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Everything in Advanced plus custom RBAC, SSO, audit logging, API access, self-hosting, multi-org support, an SLA and a dedicated CSM |
What is CodeRabbit?
CodeRabbit is an AI reviewer that comments on pull requests. It reads the diff with the surrounding codebase in context, leaves line-level comments, proposes one-click fixes, and will argue the point in a threaded chat when you push back. It also runs linters and static analysis alongside its own review, so one pass covers both.
It installs into the review step you already have rather than asking your team to move anywhere: GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab.com and self-managed GitLab, Bitbucket Cloud and Data Center, and Azure DevOps. CodeRabbit says it is on 17,000 customers and six million repositories — their figures, not ours.
CodeRabbit features
CodeRabbit pros & cons
Who CodeRabbit is best for
CodeRabbit alternatives
GreptileAI review with whole-codebase context and a free tier for a single developer.Visit ↗
QodoPR review plus test generation, with a free programme for qualifying open-source projects.Visit ↗
GraphiteStacked pull requests with AI review layered on a faster merge workflow.Visit ↗
GitHub CopilotCode review inside the GitHub you already pay for, bundled with completions.Visit ↗CodeRabbit deal — frequently asked questions
Is there a CodeRabbit promo code?
No, and be wary of sites offering one. What CodeRabbit actually gives you is a 14-day free trial on any plan with no credit card, and free reviews forever on public repositories. We would rather tell you that than invent a coupon.
How much does CodeRabbit cost?
Per developer per month: Essentials $30, or $24 billed annually; Team $60, or $48 annually; Advanced $90, or $72 annually. Enterprise is quoted. Public repositories are free on every plan. Prices are as published on 29 September 2026.
Is CodeRabbit free for open source?
Yes. Sign up with GitHub or GitLab, install it on a public repository, and reviews are free with no time limit. The 14-day trial only matters once you point it at a private repo.
Which git platforms does CodeRabbit work with?
GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab.com and self-managed GitLab, Bitbucket Cloud and Bitbucket Data Center, and Azure DevOps. Private-network installs are supported through a reverse tunnel, and self-hosting is available on Enterprise.
Which plan do I need?
Essentials covers reviews, one-click fixes and chat. Team is the step most teams end up on, because custom pre-merge checks and generated unit tests live there. Advanced is for teams that want a security pass on every pull request. Trial the tier you think you need — the trial is the same length on all of them.
What are the best CodeRabbit alternatives?
Greptile for codebase-context review with a free single-developer tier, Qodo if you want test generation alongside review, Graphite if stacked pull requests are the actual bottleneck, and GitHub Copilot if you would rather not add a vendor. Pricing in this category moved several times in 2026, so check each one's current page rather than a comparison table.
